Fireside Tuesday Night IMPs League


Fireside IMPs League
Superbowl Championship



     Sunday, July 7th, 2002 saw our first ever Spring IMPs
League "SuperBowl" showdown between our FIT League champions,
Team Ulli3 ("Ulli" being short for "Ulrica" and pronounced 
"OO-LEE", by the way) and our GAIL League Champions, Team 
Toddy.  After seven boards Team Toddy established a healthy 
28-14 IMPs lead.  Over the next 17 boards, though, Ulli3's
squad narrowed this gap but fell short of a comeback.
Hence, by a final score of 52-42 IMPs, Team Toddy became our
first Fireside IMPs League "Superbowl" Champions.  We heartily
congratulate Toddy, MBar, Gaus271 and JudyDee, along with 
fill-ins DeniseB and Neophyte, for their fine victory.  Very
well done!

================================================================

IMPs       north          IMP Board 1
Dlr: North toddy
Vul: None  S QJT62        west     north east south
           H AKQJ852      caphotel toddy jbot judydee
           D
           C 8                     2C    2D    3C
west             east     pass     3H    pass  4NT
caphotel         jbot     pass     5S    pass  6NT
S 985            S K7    (all pass)
H 74             H 96
D JT83           D AQ9754 Opening Lead: DJ
C QT42           C J76    Result: -1
           south          Score: -50  
           judydee        IMPs: -11.00
           S A43
           H T3      1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13
           D K62   W DJ  5  7  4 D3 D8 DT C4 S8  2  T S9  Q
           C AK953 N S2  6  2  A-HK-HQ-HJ-H8-H5-C8 ST SJ SQ
                   E  A-S7  9  6 D4 D5 D7 C6 C7  J SK  9 DQ
                   S  2  A-HT-H3 S3 D6 C3 C5 S4  A-CK-DK-C9

     One of the finest players that I have ever met is Drew
Cannell.  Drew has a favourite expression:  "If yer gonna
bid 'em, ya gotta play 'em!"

     On this hand, N-S bid to a very shakey slam which 
requires S-Kx or S-Kxx and the D-Ace onside (about an
18% chance).  Here their aggressiveness would have paid
off if they had played the hand with the same exuberance
with which they bid it.  With game making at the other
table, the penalty for going down five is not significantly
more than the IMPs lost by going down one.  Hence, let's
try to make this one.

     We start by donning our rose coloured glasses and
assuming that both point cards are onside.  The problem
is that we must not only take the Spade finesse but we
must then get back to North's hand to enjoy the five
Spades.  Hence, we should travel to the North hand with
one of our Hearts, plunk down the S-Queen and let it
ride.  Once the Spades are established we return to the
North hand and run our 11 major suit winners to make 
our contract.  

     Had we stopped cautiously in, say, 3NT, we would
be far more conservative.  Winning our Diamond King
we would cash our C-AK and 6 Hearts and, with 9 tricks
"in the bag", we might take our Spade finesse for the 
overtricks.  Play 'em like you bid 'em. :)
 
================================================================

IMPs       north          IMP Board 5
Dlr: North Ulli3
Vul: N-S   S Q54          west    north east south
           H JT83         gaus271 Ulli3 mbar believer
           D 653
           C QJ8                  pass  1D   pass
west            east      1S      pass  4NT  pass
gaus271         mbar      5D      pass  6D  (all pass)
S JT62          S K
H A54           H K9      Opening Lead: D2
D 9             D AKQJT87 Result: +6
C KT962         C A53     Score: -920,  
            south         IMPs:  -9.00
            believer
            S A9873    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13
            H Q762  W  9 S2 S6 H4 C2 C6  T  5 C9  K-HA-CT SJ
            D 42    N  3  5  6 H3 H8 S4  5  T HJ  8 CJ  Q SQ
            C 74    E  T-DA-DK-DQ-DJ-D8-SK  K-D7-C3  9  A-C5
                    S D2  4 S7 S3 S8 C4  A-H2 S9  7  6 H7 HQ

     E-W did well not only to get to slam but to get to the
RIGHT slam on this one.  6C would have failed with 2 black
losers.  There were two ways to make this one.  The first
line would be to lose a Spade quickly and then take a 
ruffing finesse in Spades, pitching our Club loser from 
the East hand if North does not cover our S-Jack.

     Another line is to try a squeeze.  Ideally, we should
lose a spade, draw trumps (pitching Clubs) and then ruff a 
Spade (in case S-Qx falls).  Now we play ALL of our Diamonds
and bear down to S-J and C-K10 on Dummy with C-A53 left in
our hand.  If the same person has to guard Clubs and a major
they may be forced to concede the rest of the tricks.

     Which line is better?  The finesse is a straight 50-50
proposition.  For the squeeze to work the Hearts have to 
break 6-2 or worse OR the person with the S-Queen has to
be the one holding 3+ Clubs.  Consider this:  if 3 of my
13 cards are Clubs and only 2 of my partner's 13 cards are
Clubs the odds are 11-10 that my PARTNER has the S-Queen
(or any other given non-Club card).  Hence, I rate the
simple finesse as being ever-so-slightly superior to the
squeeze--after the S-Queen fails to drop, at least.

================================================================

IMPs      north            IMP Board 6
Dlr: East toddy
Vul: E-W  S J73            west     north  east  south
          H A9             caphotel toddy  jbot  judydee
          D KJ97
          C A953                           1S    3C
west            east       X        4C     4S    pass
caphotel        jbot       pass     5C     pass  pass
S 64            S AKQT982  X       (all pass)
H Q8432         H KT5
D AQT64         D 3        Opening Lead: S6
C 7             C 42       Result: -1
          south            Score: -100  
          judydee          IMPs:  11.00
          S 5
          H J76      1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11
          D 852    W S6  4  7 H3  A-H2 D4  Q D6  T H4
          C KQJT86 N  3  7  3  5  7  A-SJ  K-C9  J-D9
                   E  8-SA  2  4  3  5  Q S2 S9 ST HT
                   S  5 C8-CK-CQ-D2  6 C6-D5  J-D8 H7

     This hand provided our champions with their margin
of victory.  Everyone knows that I am a big fan of "getting
in early".  South's fine 3C pre-emptive overcall set up
North's 5C sacrifice against a 4S game that garnered E-W
+620 at the other table.

     Sacrifices are comparatively rare at IMPs.  At MPs,
we just need to be "right" (i.e. lose less in 5C than
against 4S) more often than "wrong" (i.e. where 4S might
go down, making our sacrifice a "phantom", or going for
more than -620 in 5C doubled).  At IMPs, though, it would
seem that -800 will lose us 5 IMPs versus -620 while -500
will only gain us 3 IMPs.  Hence, the odds would seem to
be 5-to-3 against such close (i.e. 300 or 500 versus a
non-vulnerable game, 420, OR 500 or 800 versus a vulnerable
game, 620) sacrifices.

     There is a slight flaw in this conventional wisdom.
You see, the opponents don't always double us in our
sacrifices.  Yes, sometimes they forget to, but often
they bid on to the five level.  Should they misguess and
actually go down in their contract the small plus that
we garner will translate to a LOT of IMPs:  (420 + 5) 10
if the opponents are not vulnerable, 12 (620 + 100) if 
they ARE vulnerable.  Hence, the difference between MPs
and IMPs in this regard is NOT as marked as some may 
think.
 
================================================================

     Again, we congratulate the winners, Team Toddy:  Toddy,
JudyDee, MBar and Gaus271 along with their fill-ins, Neophyte
and DeniseB.  We also thank our FIT Champion Team for a fine
performance: Ulli3, CapHotel, JBot, Believer and Timbit. Very 
well done, one and all!  You can see the results at

        http://www.firesides.net/teams021.htm

     We'll see you all on Sunday at 11:00 A.M. PST or Tuesday 
night at 5:00 P.M. PST...and in the Summer League!

Colin

P.S.  Check out our sign-up site for the Summer League at:

        http://www.firesides.net/signmeup.htm



Fireside IMPs League Site
Click here to go back to the Firesides' IMPs League site for scores, lineups, schedules and other details.
Fireside Support Site
Click here to go to the Firesides' Support site to ensure that the Fireside Bidding Practices continue.
Take our SAYC Test
Click here to try our online SAYC Test. Be warned, though: this is a tough one!
The Fireside Chat
CLICK HERE to check out some of the back issues of the Fireside Chat newsletter.
The Brains Behind Kaltica's Firesides
CLICK HERE to go to discover the sordid truth behind Kaltica's Firesides.
OKBridge Web Site
CLICK HERE to go to the OKBridge Web site for information on downloading and using OKBridge.
Pictures from the 1999 Boston Fall Nationals
Click HERE to see Moogal's pictures of some of the Firesiders at the 1999 Fall Nationals in Boston.
The Fifth Chair Mentoring Program
This fine organization, run by Marcia "tarsh" West, arranges mentors for those who can't afford professional tutoring.
Colin Ward's Bridge Page
This bridge web page's technical and humour articles will appeal to the intermediate and experienced player.
Reports From Vancouver
Colin's reports from the 1999 Spring Nationals in Vancouver.
Links to Other Bridge Pages
The Canadian Bridge Federation has one of the internet's most interesting and comprehensive lists of bridge links.
Baron Barclay's Bridge Supplies
CLICK HERE if you'd like to order bridge books or supplies from Baron Barclay's, the largest source on the internet.
Sid and Abby's Bridge Site
Click HERE to go to the Sid and Abby's Site to see their "Hand of the Week" in "bridge movie" format.
Space Cadets' Home Page
Here you can spend weeks reading the hand records and instructive comments intended for the bridge neophyte.
SAYC Simplified by Waynef and Ana
This site by Anna "Ana" Marsh and Wayne "waynef" Flourney is a good source for learning SAYC.
Colin's Personal (Non-Bridge) Web Page
If tired of bridge (heresy, yes, but it happens) you may wish to switch to Acquire, poetry, gardening, music or literature.